Ran the new 93

by **alltracman78** » Tue Aug 31, 2004 12:52 am

2of81 wrote:Went to the track tonite and ran the new bone stock 93. I was kinda disapointed and kinda happy.

That's right on what a new one should run. So it's actually pretty good.

by **yamayuki** » Tue Aug 31, 2004 9:06 pm

15.9..thats a pretty good time...i've seen and has a friend who done 16's with his alltrac..i haven't time mine yet...but i know it should be in the low 16's to high 15's...just being in the 15's should make you happy...i've also seen lots of GSX only doing 16's..only a couple like the 90-94 models that actually hit 15.7...i believe those are comparable to our st165's...but again nice times...

by **ChrisD** » Thu Sep 02, 2004 2:54 pm

by **2of81** » Thu Sep 02, 2004 6:55 pm

Yea if I would have given the clutch more hell I would have gone faster, but the humidty being so high and the MPH being 84.12 and the 165 being 85.69 I am happy considering the ST165 has a gutted cat and cone filter and does 15.69.

by **Guest** » Mon Sep 06, 2004 3:58 am

Wasn't stock 15.3 or something real close to that. I know from driving my 91 mr2 w/ a 94 celi 5sfe, it will jump on the all-trac from 0-40 then the at will start kicking in and catch and pull away.

What I'm also wondering, is that my mom has a 2000 v6 5speed camry, it feels as fast or even faster than my mr2 or the all-trac. I could never find official numbers for manual v6 camry's because they are rare.

by **billprice** » Tue Sep 07, 2004 2:32 am

Butt dynos are notoriously inaccurate.

by **2of81** » Tue Sep 07, 2004 12:48 pm

billprice wrote:Butt dynos are notoriously inaccurate.

My skinny ass is acurate as hell, I can tell the differance between a 5 and 8 horse briggs.

by **alltracman78** » Tue Sep 07, 2004 2:23 pm

lol

by **2of81** » Sun Sep 12, 2004 5:58 am

Well I am done racing this car, I ran tonite at the local import drags. I did consistent 16's all night at around 81 mph wondering WTF since my times before were 15.9's at 84 mph. I finally hit it off with one good last run which ran faster and quicker than the 165.

RT----------.9421
60'---------2.0959
330'--------6.3127
1/8et-------9.8657
1/8mph----69.11
1000et-----12.9565
1000mph---79.18
1/4------15.5803
1/4mph-----85.81

Ran the new 93

Re: Ran the new 93

Who is online


Members don't see the above ad. Register now - it's free!