The ST165/ST185/ST205 4WD systems are really FWD? Weigh in!

General Chat

Re: The ST165/ST185/ST205 4WD systems are really FWD? Weigh

Postby athousandleaves » Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:30 am

IMG_20130819_012533.JPG

IMG_20130819_012557.JPG


/thread.
Members don't see the above ad. Register now - it's free!
1992 Red GT-FOUR RC 626•1800
Image
1992 White turbo4WD
User avatar
athousandleaves
Established Member
 
Posts: 1288
Images: 0
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 12:54 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: The ST165/ST185/ST205 4WD systems are really FWD? Weigh

Postby Theman88b » Mon Aug 19, 2013 3:31 pm

Thanks for that picture and description^^^^. You guys are forgetting about one thing though...unless you are going 88 mph the flux capacitor will not operate so thus the VC cannot send the proper amount of torque to the wheels.:rofl:
'88 Toyota Celica All Trac Turbo(Blue) 145k - Rebuilt and Bored 1mm over, big psi soon!!
'92 Ford Taurus SHO(White) 212k - Some mods but still my DD
User avatar
Theman88b
Club Member
 
Posts: 100
Images: 3
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 1:01 am
Location: Centennial, CO

1988 Toyota Celica

Re: The ST165/ST185/ST205 4WD systems are really FWD? Weigh

Postby phattyduck » Mon Aug 19, 2013 4:13 pm

It wouldn't be the internet if somebody wasn't spouting off incorrect information. Thank you, athousandleaves for posting the official details from Toyota.

I'll be very curious how good/bad my manual trans Camry Alltrac (no viscous coupler, only the center locker) acts in snow when I finally get it up and running again... The auto-locker on the auto trans Camry Alltrac is kinda fun - slip, slip, lock and go (then oversteer with the helical rear diff I have on it)!

-Charlie
'89 Camry LE Alltrac 3S-GTE - SV25/ST205 hybrid
'99 4Runner SR5 4WD 5VZ-FE
Previous: '88 Camry LE Alltrac 3S-GE BEAMS, '90 Camry 3S-GTE, '90 Camry DX
User avatar
phattyduck
Established Member
 
Posts: 1045
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 8:09 am
Location: Pasadena, CA

Re: The ST165/ST185/ST205 4WD systems are really FWD? Weigh

Postby CMS-GT4 » Mon Aug 19, 2013 5:51 pm

athousandleaves wrote:
IMG_20130819_012533.JPG

IMG_20130819_012557.JPG


/thread.


LOL, I screen capped the same text but not the image to post in this thread. If he simply took 10 minutes to watch the video he would understand how this actually works and that something is wrong with his gearbox that he is using the base is opinion.
Coldiron
92 st185 (205 swap) | 03 350Z Track (sold) | 13 Pilot | 17 Mazda3
www.noritoy.com | noritoy.deviantart.com | http://www.alltrac.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=44&t=19891
User avatar
CMS-GT4
GTSilver Member
 
Posts: 10341
Images: 7
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:12 pm
Location: St Louis Area (IL)

1992 Toyota Celica

Re: The ST165/ST185/ST205 4WD systems are really FWD? Weigh

Postby BADNEWS » Thu Nov 21, 2013 12:08 am

Well my car has a stock open front diff. The stock open center diff with an upgraded Mario Viscous Coupling with a rating of 400NM vs the stock Viscous coupling that has a rating of 150-175NM. And a rear Cusco clutch type LSD. Here is a video of me going through and showing my my wheels are linked together.

http://youtu.be/OiVXBazmlWo

Here is a video of me showing the freeplay in the driveline and since I have 2 hands now cause my camera aka my phone is on the ground I have more force to try and move the rear tires through the VC unit fighting me.

http://youtu.be/Xx1f6HNlGQQ

This is a view from the opposite side of the car. I was checking to see that the rear wheels were in fact moving in the same direction which means the center diff/VC unit where moving. If they had moved in opposite directions then that would mean the discs in the rear LSD were allowing the tire to be spun and the Center diff/VC where still stationary.

http://youtu.be/HNkWvblxk6I
90 ST185 W/ HTZ4094R (6768), 2.2, Fully Built
865AWHP, 591 torque
Hope to have some 1/4 times this summer of 2016!!!
User avatar
BADNEWS
Club Member
 
Posts: 671
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 5:37 pm
Location: Milwaukee, WI

Previous

Return to Club Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests