concealer404
New member
I'm getting close to the point where i pull my car out of it's 2+ year hibernation and finally finish it. The rest of my projects are getting wrapped up right now. (Please let me know if there's interest in those, currently assembling hopefully a National-level SCCA Solo SMF car.)
Time to get the Celica moving again. It's not an AllTrac, it's a 92 GT hatch. Previously i did most of the suspension and exterior work, so now on to the fun stuff.
Last weekend, i picked up my starting point for the motor. (Still have to find a trans to go with my TRD LSD)
Got a gen2 out of an MR2 Turbo with a case of rod bearing soup. Complete minus wiring harness, ecu, map sensor, and has a cracked cam gear. Came with blown turbo (likely cause of rod bearing soup) and an ST205 trans. (That i'll be selling, i have no use for it.)
And with that, i already have my first question.
I'm "only" looking for 350-400whp in this 2300-2400lb FWD car. The way i see it, i have a few options, and for the life of me, i can't tell which is best. Being that this motor already needs to be gone through, it's unlikely that i'll just rebuild to stock specs. I'd like to pick up some efficiency, as well as gain headroom for if i were to ever dump the motor in an MR2 down the road.
1) Try to be a little more efficient. Stock bottom end, headwork/cams.
2) MORE efficient. Built bottom end with higher compression, headwork/cams.
3) Build bottom end to be bombproof in case i get bored and want to try my hand at Sport Compact drags. (heh, right.)
4) Stroker. I have the block and crank out of the Celica currently that could be used.
Cost isn't really an issue, but i'm also not looking to build a $10k motor. Of course, i would rather do it RIGHT the first time, and not have to re-do anything. I'm starting to get burnt out working on all these cars, and if i could put this together and not have to pull the motor ever again, i'd be extremely happy. :lol:
Which of these would you guys recommend in a light FWD car? My gut says "stroker," but i'm a little worried about the torque/spool characteristics when combined with FWD. Of course, i could also size turbo appropriately, so there is that. Are the strokers just as "revvy" as the 2.0s? I already have a FWD "grunter" in my MX6, and i have no interest in exploring that particular realm again. It sucks spinning into 4th gear.
Oh... and the goal for the car? I'm not real sure anymore. The car was NO fun at all to drive when i parked it. It developed a front end noise, which in retrospect i'm pretty sure is just a bad balljoint. It was so awful to drive i didn't even bother fixing it, it's just sat for two years. I'm sure everything is crusty, interior probably waterlogged due to a couple leaks i never took care of, brakes are shot, shocks might not have held up.
Why was it awful? Not enough power to even make the chassis THINK of pulling any shenanigans. Required no finesse or attention to drive anymore. It was obnoxiously fast in tight technical roads, but just didn't involve you at all. It was hammer down, turn the wheel, and blaaaaahhhhh. I still stand by "suspension and brakes first," but in this case, i overdid it badly.
I originally wanted to build this thing as a fast street car. But i already have that. (Turbo Miata, 90 MX6 GT)
Then i wanted to build it for SCCA Solo competition. But i already have that. (SMF Escort, which could also be considered a fast street car on occasion.)
So... i'm just going to build it and see what happens. Might end up as a Time Trial/Hill Climb car. Might end up as a nice hardparker that actually gets driven hard. I really don't know.
Time to get the Celica moving again. It's not an AllTrac, it's a 92 GT hatch. Previously i did most of the suspension and exterior work, so now on to the fun stuff.
Last weekend, i picked up my starting point for the motor. (Still have to find a trans to go with my TRD LSD)
Got a gen2 out of an MR2 Turbo with a case of rod bearing soup. Complete minus wiring harness, ecu, map sensor, and has a cracked cam gear. Came with blown turbo (likely cause of rod bearing soup) and an ST205 trans. (That i'll be selling, i have no use for it.)
And with that, i already have my first question.
I'm "only" looking for 350-400whp in this 2300-2400lb FWD car. The way i see it, i have a few options, and for the life of me, i can't tell which is best. Being that this motor already needs to be gone through, it's unlikely that i'll just rebuild to stock specs. I'd like to pick up some efficiency, as well as gain headroom for if i were to ever dump the motor in an MR2 down the road.
1) Try to be a little more efficient. Stock bottom end, headwork/cams.
2) MORE efficient. Built bottom end with higher compression, headwork/cams.
3) Build bottom end to be bombproof in case i get bored and want to try my hand at Sport Compact drags. (heh, right.)
4) Stroker. I have the block and crank out of the Celica currently that could be used.
Cost isn't really an issue, but i'm also not looking to build a $10k motor. Of course, i would rather do it RIGHT the first time, and not have to re-do anything. I'm starting to get burnt out working on all these cars, and if i could put this together and not have to pull the motor ever again, i'd be extremely happy. :lol:
Which of these would you guys recommend in a light FWD car? My gut says "stroker," but i'm a little worried about the torque/spool characteristics when combined with FWD. Of course, i could also size turbo appropriately, so there is that. Are the strokers just as "revvy" as the 2.0s? I already have a FWD "grunter" in my MX6, and i have no interest in exploring that particular realm again. It sucks spinning into 4th gear.
Oh... and the goal for the car? I'm not real sure anymore. The car was NO fun at all to drive when i parked it. It developed a front end noise, which in retrospect i'm pretty sure is just a bad balljoint. It was so awful to drive i didn't even bother fixing it, it's just sat for two years. I'm sure everything is crusty, interior probably waterlogged due to a couple leaks i never took care of, brakes are shot, shocks might not have held up.
Why was it awful? Not enough power to even make the chassis THINK of pulling any shenanigans. Required no finesse or attention to drive anymore. It was obnoxiously fast in tight technical roads, but just didn't involve you at all. It was hammer down, turn the wheel, and blaaaaahhhhh. I still stand by "suspension and brakes first," but in this case, i overdid it badly.
I originally wanted to build this thing as a fast street car. But i already have that. (Turbo Miata, 90 MX6 GT)
Then i wanted to build it for SCCA Solo competition. But i already have that. (SMF Escort, which could also be considered a fast street car on occasion.)
So... i'm just going to build it and see what happens. Might end up as a Time Trial/Hill Climb car. Might end up as a nice hardparker that actually gets driven hard. I really don't know.