Dyno results :)

Pictures, Videos, and Links to other Media

Dyno results :)

Postby CSAlltrac » Fri May 08, 2009 9:17 pm

:D Not to bad guys, what do you think
Image
Image
Image
Image
Vids kinda suck so sorry for that
Members don't see the above ad. Register now - it's free!
ALLTRAC AT FIRST SIGHT
User avatar
CSAlltrac
Established Member
 
Posts: 2029
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 1:47 pm
Location: ATX

Postby edv-tek » Sat May 09, 2009 12:12 am

Believe me but I don't Know. But these fiquires seem low from what I sees. I fiquire you should be around below 14's. Even with a mostly stock alltrac with a/p aftermarket I was getting around 238 @ 4 wheels.
Ed Vaughan
White Supercharged Previa LE Alltrac w/beige leather 208K and counting
1988 Mercedes Benz 560SL 42K
Maryland
User avatar
edv-tek
Club Member
 
Posts: 370
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 6:18 pm
Location: Maryland

Postby Mafix » Sat May 09, 2009 12:35 am

what boost level?
Mafix
Gold Member
 
Posts: 5877
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 10:56 pm

Postby CelicaAllTrac92 » Sat May 09, 2009 12:39 am

I'm out of the loop, what are the mods on the car?
92 All-Trac
Photo Album
Image
CelicaAllTrac92
Club Member
 
Posts: 411
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 11:02 pm
Location: Birmingham, AL, USA

Postby CSAlltrac » Sat May 09, 2009 1:11 am

there are a total of about 5 pulls on this sheet, the low ones were a baseline with a old jet ecu i had, the high ones are the new blitz ecu i have paired with a safc2 with minor correction tuned into it. 213 was the highest hp with 251 tq. My mods are, full 3'' exhaust HKS catback with a aussie DP and a fully custom 3'' midpipe made by http://nicholsautofab.com/ front mount three core intercooler, straight intake with HKS mushroom filter, HKS boost controller set at about 17lbs, tvis gutted,HKS cams, royal purple always used, TRD plug wires, NGK bkr7e that are one step colder from stock, i feel like im missing something but thats most of it, I think im doing pretty good considering it mostly stock still and compared to other numbers i have seen. :shrug: either way im happy with it.
ALLTRAC AT FIRST SIGHT
User avatar
CSAlltrac
Established Member
 
Posts: 2029
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 1:47 pm
Location: ATX

Postby WarTowels » Sat May 09, 2009 1:23 am

CT-26?
2003 S2000
1985 300TD
User avatar
WarTowels
Gold GTfour God
 
Posts: 6443
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 4:30 am
Location: I live in a garage.

Postby Mafix » Sat May 09, 2009 1:39 am

ct26 that sounds right.
Mafix
Gold Member
 
Posts: 5877
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 10:56 pm

Postby CelicaAllTrac92 » Sat May 09, 2009 3:18 am

That does seem a little low even with a CT26. Have you gotten a 1/4 mile time? I got a 13.9 with the mods in my sig (except 2.5" catback instead of 3"), and plugged into various hp calculators I get about 300 flywheel hp which should be more than 213 at the wheels. :shrug:
92 All-Trac
Photo Album
Image
CelicaAllTrac92
Club Member
 
Posts: 411
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 11:02 pm
Location: Birmingham, AL, USA

Postby CSAlltrac » Sat May 09, 2009 3:52 am

Bone stock CT26 yes, I dont 1/4 mile this car hardly at all. I did like twice though and it was on the jet ecu making far less than the blitz. It did a 14.3 when i ran it and that was with like 9 lbs of boost because the stupid jet i had still had fuel cut, dont ask me why :shrug: . But like i said, alltrac was not built for 1/4 mile crap. 300 At the crank i dont think would put down more than 200 beacuse of drivetrain loss and these have tons of it, but i could be wrong
ALLTRAC AT FIRST SIGHT
User avatar
CSAlltrac
Established Member
 
Posts: 2029
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 1:47 pm
Location: ATX

Postby hacker_720 » Sat May 09, 2009 2:52 pm

Dunno guys, seems alright to me, I would take 250 ft/lbs any day on stock CT26
BOTTLE ARE FOR BABIES...REAL MEN GET BLOWN
1990 ST185 2.2Lt
hacker_720
Established Member
 
Posts: 1634
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Postby CelicaAllTrac92 » Sat May 09, 2009 10:11 pm

CSAlltrac wrote:Bone stock CT26 yes, I dont 1/4 mile this car hardly at all. I did like twice though and it was on the jet ecu making far less than the blitz. It did a 14.3 when i ran it and that was with like 9 lbs of boost because the stupid jet i had still had fuel cut, dont ask me why :shrug: . But like i said, alltrac was not built for 1/4 mile crap. 300 At the crank i dont think would put down more than 200 beacuse of drivetrain loss and these have tons of it, but i could be wrong

I was just trying to find a way to compare the two. 25% drivetrain loss from 300 is 225 awhp, so it may be about right. I wonder why the torque is so much more though? 14.3 quarter mile time with only 9 psi is really good. That's roughly a whole second off the stock time with the same turbo and same boost.
92 All-Trac
Photo Album
Image
CelicaAllTrac92
Club Member
 
Posts: 411
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 11:02 pm
Location: Birmingham, AL, USA

Postby CSAlltrac » Sun May 10, 2009 5:01 am

I think a one second gain is logical with the intercooler, DP, and the other small things i had then.
ALLTRAC AT FIRST SIGHT
User avatar
CSAlltrac
Established Member
 
Posts: 2029
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 1:47 pm
Location: ATX

Postby redGT4 » Sun May 10, 2009 11:52 am

Chassis dyno operators in oz us the DIN correction method, instead of SAE, as DIN method gives lower power; u probably wouldn't have made 200 hp if thats the case.
54 trim hiflowed ct26; Custom top mount;2 1/2" exhaust; Turbosmart boost controller(not fitted); Autometer CF series; Everything else stock; The Haunter of the Hills.
redGT4
Club Member
 
Posts: 511
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 7:25 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia


Return to Gallery

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 2 guests