The real reason our cars understeer
37 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
ok i'm sure suspension gurus like racefiend will rip into me for posting without having a clue about what i'm saying but from what i gather (and i admit its not much) a harder rear anti-roll bar will not take away the understeer problem in the way we would like. it would simply cancel it with oversteer. so in a sense you get rid of the understeer but is this the ideal solution? this is what i wish i had answers to. concrete answers
softer front springs would also mean that you would need a larger diameter front antiroll bar which seems to contradict trend in higher performance race cars which seem to prefer more spring rate and less anti-roll bar.
as for changing the torque split ratio front to rear im not sure that its possible to change it. i always assumed it was fixed at 50/50 permanently. but if this is not so i would also expect less push under effect from a 60% rear torque split.
but then again i dunno what the hell i'm talking about right? lol
softer front springs would also mean that you would need a larger diameter front antiroll bar which seems to contradict trend in higher performance race cars which seem to prefer more spring rate and less anti-roll bar.
as for changing the torque split ratio front to rear im not sure that its possible to change it. i always assumed it was fixed at 50/50 permanently. but if this is not so i would also expect less push under effect from a 60% rear torque split.
but then again i dunno what the hell i'm talking about right? lol
| Members don't see the above ad. Register now - it's free! | |
- GTfour@alltrac.net
- Club Member
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:42 pm
any posts on these forums outlining the front/rear weight distribution of the alltracs? 165 185 and 205?
- GTfour@alltrac.net
- Club Member
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:42 pm
Re: The real reason our cars understeer
The most typical weight distribution is 60/40. Some have managed to adjust that some. I think mine had a little less weight bias to the front when I corner weighted it.
Coldiron
92 st185 (205 swap) | 03 350Z Track (sold) 13 Pilot 02 CRV
www.noritoy.com | noritoy.deviantart.com | http://www.alltrac.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=44&t=19891

92 st185 (205 swap) | 03 350Z Track (sold) 13 Pilot 02 CRV
www.noritoy.com | noritoy.deviantart.com | http://www.alltrac.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=44&t=19891

-

CMS-GT4 - GTSilver Member
- Posts: 9279
- Images: 7
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:12 pm
- Location: St Louis Area (IL)
1992 Toyota Celica
Re: The real reason our cars understeer
CMS-GT4 wrote:The most typical weight distribution is 60/40. Some have managed to adjust that some. I think mine had a little less weight bias to the front when I corner weighted it.
Good thread life breather.
feb. 1990 alltrac red one: fun machine http://www.alltrac.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=44&t=27076#p253730
feb. 1990 alltrac blk one:dd
5x114.3 write up:
http://www.alltrac.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=43769&p=411470#p411467
feb. 1990 alltrac blk one:dd
5x114.3 write up:
http://www.alltrac.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=43769&p=411470#p411467
-

tubasteve - Established Member
- Posts: 1052
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 6:48 pm
- Location: temecula, ca(951)
Re: The real reason our cars understeer
hm, wheer did racefied gone to, did he ever post his custom setup....
<-----My avatar represents the state of my ST165 
-

rio_cyber - Club Member
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 7:24 pm
- Location: Earth, Europe,Croatia
37 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Return to Handling and Braking
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
