Denver_whiteST185
New member
sorry i kinda hijacked the thread
___Scott___":3k1edvh7 said:To dampen harmonics :wink:Maloy":3k1edvh7 said:so what is the harmonic dampener for then?
A little light reading is in order. Start here:
http://www.suprasonic.org/public_html/s ... amper.html
http://dinancars.com/whitepapersFile.asp?ID=5
From here: http://d-series.org/forums/printthread.php?t=7945
a wise old one warned me about using a lightweight pulley on a D16, I didn't listen........
What I get for being bull headed.........
http://www.bettendorf.com/~mrbone/pictu ... mainsx.jpg
interesting point...just keep a close eye on your a/f ratio I guess..that`s right! but remember that NO FPR can completly close! they lett thru 50-70lh to! so then you just have 205-185 left! (wolfcatz tested this!)
eric thompson":3etrom3v said:I think a perfectly balanced motor doesnt need balance shafts, not a harmonic balancer. IMO
CodingParadox":1gbewn27 said:They destroy lower end power. If you're looking for a drag car or a dyno queen, use 264s. Otherwise, don't.
CodingParadox":3zhkj3ja said:Yeah, but that's the flow limit of the head with this turbo. 264s would give me a little more torque around 5500 rpms, but would kill lower end power, and would end up making virtually the same peak horsepower. For significantly more power you'll need a different turbo.