1026 GT-Four Normal Body

Talk about your project car here

Re: 1026 GT-Four Normal Body

Postby Corey » Mon Aug 28, 2017 9:51 pm

Yea on the inverted ones eh? It's fine on the standard BR coilovers with the adjuster on top.
Members don't see the above ad. Register now - it's free!
Image
User avatar
Corey
GTFour God
 
Posts: 4121
Images: 50
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:12 am

1989 Toyota Celica

Re: 1026 GT-Four Normal Body

Postby eddie_gt4 » Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:06 am

so you have 17" OZ for summer? :D
'90 Toyota Celica turbo 4WD ST185 - ex
'96 Toyota Celica GT-Four ST205 - now
User avatar
eddie_gt4
Club Member
 
Posts: 516
Images: 11
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 6:21 am
Location: Vilnius, Lithuania

Re: 1026 GT-Four Normal Body

Postby Corey » Tue Aug 29, 2017 10:38 am

Right :). They are my only set of wheels now. I got them from the uk and they replaced my 16" OZs.
Image
User avatar
Corey
GTFour God
 
Posts: 4121
Images: 50
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:12 am

1989 Toyota Celica

Re: 1026 GT-Four Normal Body

Postby underscore » Tue Aug 29, 2017 7:00 pm

Ah I didn't realize you went with the ones that are the right way up, it's a much better idea.
★ 1991 GTFour RC ~ "Rebel Scum" ★
It's for sale! http://www.alltrac.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=52181
Build thread http://www.alltrac.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=44&t=44216
underscore
GTFour God
 
Posts: 3809
Images: 0
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 11:29 pm
Location: Kelowna, BC

Re: 1026 GT-Four Normal Body

Postby Corey » Mon Nov 13, 2017 1:39 am

Just got back from a week long, 5400 Km road trip from Quebec, to Halifax/PEI, then down to DC via Boston and New York before driving back up to Quebec.

Car now has 176600 km on it, still running great. The new suspension and rear 205 brakes held up really well.

One thing I would change on the suspension after having driven in the car for basically 60 hours straight is an even weaker spring rate than the 6kg/mm I've got now.

While the 6kg/mm provides a very well performing car in the turns, even with my ridiculously high ride height, it is quite stiff on back roads and shitty highways.

In the future, if I choose to upgrade to the SWIFT springs, I'll request 5kg/mm and maybe have the front dampers re-valved to accommodate the lower spring rate.

I've also noticed that the suspension travel is far less than stock, and this is very apparently when traveling over a sharp bump in the road - you can feel the wheels almost lose contact with the road surface.

Does anyone know if its possible to increase the suspension travel? Is this a function of spring length, or is it a limit of the dampers?

Image
Image
User avatar
Corey
GTFour God
 
Posts: 4121
Images: 50
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:12 am

1989 Toyota Celica

Re: 1026 GT-Four Normal Body

Postby underscore » Mon Nov 13, 2017 3:11 am

The travel should be able the same, but the stiffer damper may be preventing it from compressing fully.
★ 1991 GTFour RC ~ "Rebel Scum" ★
It's for sale! http://www.alltrac.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=52181
Build thread http://www.alltrac.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=44&t=44216
underscore
GTFour God
 
Posts: 3809
Images: 0
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 11:29 pm
Location: Kelowna, BC

Re: 1026 GT-Four Normal Body

Postby Corey » Mon Nov 13, 2017 3:14 am

Extension is definitely shorter than stock, which is what I'm more concerned about since it means there is less compliance with uneven roads. When jacking up the car via the pinch rail, it now lifts both front and rear wheels off the ground!!
Image
User avatar
Corey
GTFour God
 
Posts: 4121
Images: 50
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:12 am

1989 Toyota Celica

Previous

Return to My Project

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest