You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Dyno results :)
- Thread starter CSAlltrac
- Start date
Not to bad guys, what do you think
CelicaAllTrac92
New member
I'm out of the loop, what are the mods on the car?
there are a total of about 5 pulls on this sheet, the low ones were a baseline with a old jet ecu i had, the high ones are the new blitz ecu i have paired with a safc2 with minor correction tuned into it. 213 was the highest hp with 251 tq. My mods are, full 3'' exhaust HKS catback with a aussie DP and a fully custom 3'' midpipe made by http://nicholsautofab.com/ front mount three core intercooler, straight intake with HKS mushroom filter, HKS boost controller set at about 17lbs, tvis gutted,HKS cams, royal purple always used, TRD plug wires, NGK bkr7e that are one step colder from stock, i feel like im missing something but thats most of it, I think im doing pretty good considering it mostly stock still and compared to other numbers i have seen. :shrug: either way im happy with it.
CelicaAllTrac92
New member
That does seem a little low even with a CT26. Have you gotten a 1/4 mile time? I got a 13.9 with the mods in my sig (except 2.5" catback instead of 3"), and plugged into various hp calculators I get about 300 flywheel hp which should be more than 213 at the wheels. :shrug:
Bone stock CT26 yes, I dont 1/4 mile this car hardly at all. I did like twice though and it was on the jet ecu making far less than the blitz. It did a 14.3 when i ran it and that was with like 9 lbs of boost because the stupid jet i had still had fuel cut, dont ask me why :shrug: . But like i said, alltrac was not built for 1/4 mile crap. 300 At the crank i dont think would put down more than 200 beacuse of drivetrain loss and these have tons of it, but i could be wrong
hacker_720
New member
Dunno guys, seems alright to me, I would take 250 ft/lbs any day on stock CT26
CelicaAllTrac92
New member
I was just trying to find a way to compare the two. 25% drivetrain loss from 300 is 225 awhp, so it may be about right. I wonder why the torque is so much more though? 14.3 quarter mile time with only 9 psi is really good. That's roughly a whole second off the stock time with the same turbo and same boost.CSAlltrac":i86nax3b said:Bone stock CT26 yes, I dont 1/4 mile this car hardly at all. I did like twice though and it was on the jet ecu making far less than the blitz. It did a 14.3 when i ran it and that was with like 9 lbs of boost because the stupid jet i had still had fuel cut, dont ask me why :shrug: . But like i said, alltrac was not built for 1/4 mile crap. 300 At the crank i dont think would put down more than 200 beacuse of drivetrain loss and these have tons of it, but i could be wrong